Even with a booming economy and a low unemployment rate, many Americans are still struggling to make ends meet. And believe it or not, fracking has made it easier. Not only does fracking help to create jobs and save Americans money, but it also helps to increase wages in the United States. In counties where shale resources are extracted through fracking, there has been an increase in average incomes by 10 to 20 percent.
Fracking has helped the American economy in so many different ways, and at Well Water Solutions, we give back by helping fracking companies like yours save more money. With waste water treatment and high-quality frac tanks, we can help you to reduce your operational costs on the frac site, while also helping to increase your production. Would you like to learn more about how we can help you save more money?
Obama: "Suddenly America is the largest oil producer, that was me people Now some Democrats are openly hostile to the fossil fuel industry , with Sen. Bernie Sanders calling for criminal prosecution of some companies. The federal government can limit export licenses for oil and natural gas. At the local level, despite environmental and safety concerns, voters have been reluctant to restrict fracking. A ballot measure that would have severely restricted fracking in Colorado failed in , despite Democrats winning the governorship and majorities in both state houses.
It would be less disruptive and contentious and would allow the country to continue harnessing the benefits of fracking while coming up with better options. That would require investment in clean energy research and development, particularly for technologies like long-duration energy storage and advanced nuclear. Pricing carbon dioxide would also help ensure that the biggest sources of greenhouse gases get reduced first, and the revenue these prices generate could fund further research.
Update, October 7, This story was originally published in It has been updated now to reflect discussion of a fracking ban during the vice-presidential debate. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower through understanding. Financial contributions from our readers are a critical part of supporting our resource-intensive work and help us keep our journalism free for all. Please consider making a contribution to Vox today to help us keep our work free for all.
Cookie banner We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from. By choosing I Accept , you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies. The best case for and against a fracking ban. Reddit Pocket Flipboard Email. Hydraulic fracturing has made the US a leader in oil production and helped curb greenhouse gas emissions.
Michael S. The best case against a ban: Fracking has reduced greenhouse gas emissions and helped expand clean energy Though hydraulic fracturing as a technique has been around since the 19th century and the first commercial fracking for gas took place in the s, the most recent fracking boom started in earnest around Fracking has now become the dominant technique for extracting oil and gas in the US.
Fracking with horizontal drilling has quickly overtaken other forms of oil and gas extraction in the US.
The advent of fracking has led to a decline in US greenhouse gas emissions. The best case for a ban: Fracking keeps us dependent on fossil fuels and undermines decarbonization Both the oil and natural gas produced from fracking have their downsides. Power-related emissions declined and transportation emissions rose, driving overall US emissions upward. Rhodium Group Low oil prices have undermined the business case for cleaner transportation alternatives, like electric cars and fuel cell-powered buses.
Delivered Fridays. Thanks for signing up! They already receive dozens of violation notices at sites, with little effect. ISSUE: Fracking operations are sometimes taking place near and around populated areas, with consequences for the local built and natural environments.
PRO FRACKING: Water intensity is lower for fracking than other fossil fuels and nuclear: Coal, nuclear and oil extraction use approximately two, three, and 10 times, respectively, as much water as fracking per energy unit, and corn ethanol may use 1, times more if the plants are irrigated.
The operations are targeted and finite, and the productivity of wells is steadily rising , getting more value during operations. Moreover, the overall societal benefits outweigh the downsides, which are largely subjective in this respect. Still, that means that a small proportion of people shoulder the burden and downsides, with no real compensation for this intrusive new industrial presence.
Fracking is hugely water-intensive: A well can require anywhere from two- to million gallons of water, with another 25 percent used for operations such as drilling and extraction. It can impact local water sources. The big, heavy trucks beat up our roads over hundreds of trips back-and-forth — with well-documented consequences for local budgets and infrastructure. In places such as Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Colorado, the drilling rigs have popped up near where people have their homes, diminishing the quality of life and creating an industrial feel to some of our communities.
This is poor planning at best, and sheer greed at its worst. It seldom involves the preferences of the local residents. It is the opposite of a sustainable solution, as well production tends to drop sharply after initial fracking. Within just five years, wells may produce just 10 percent of what they did in the first month of operation.
It is a giant unfunded scheme. ISSUE: Fracking wells, drilled thousands of feet down, may change geology in a potentially negative way, leading to earthquakes. Skip to content. Our Team Our Advisors Careers. How Fracking Strengthens America. This site uses cookies: Find out more.
0コメント