Call it madness if you will. Love and affection keep us sane, and the sane seek to preserve them. By the end of the play he is completely unmoored from such livening ties, through actions of his own and pressures from the outside world. Post by Sara Barkat. I like my tea black with a special love for Indian chai and my novels long give me sci-fi, fantasy, or 19th century to make me especially happy! Speaking of the universe, I have a passion for learning about anything from black holes to the mysteries of time.
Sara, I love this. It also makes me think that depending on culture and time period sanity might be defined differently. Social indicators are certainly helpful. The one who withdraws permanently, cuts ties altogether, might well be mad. Hamlet feigns madness in order to attain his objective of misleading Claudius and his attendants to believe he is mad to protect himself, and always remains in complete control of his psyche despite other character 's doubts.
After swearing to follow the ghost 's request, Hamlet tells Horatio that he will begin "to put an antic disposition on" I, v, But the Author makes it seem like Hamlet never truly falls into complete insanity. Who does it, then? His madness. Not only that, but his craziness seems to appear in his speech. Despite this, Hamlet carries reason behind each action and although Claudius murdered his father, murdering him would also turn Hamlet into a murderer, something that modern thought would warn us is wrong.
What if it tempt you toward the flood, my lord, Or to the dreadful summit of the cliff That beetles o 'er his base into the sea, And there assume some other, horrible form Which might deprive your sovereignty of reason And draw you into madness?
Think of it. Slightly later on in Act II Hamlet gives one of the first indications that the madness he was displaying was fake by dominating a witty conversation with polonius. Essays Essays FlashCards. Browse Essays. Sign in. Essay Sample Check Writing Quality. Show More. Read More. Words: - Pages: 5.
However, as with many other examples of Hamlet's double-speak, there is a method to the apparent madness. Here Hamlet refers to the metaphysical distinction between the king's physical body and the body of the state for which he serves as the head. The first half of the sentence may refer to either of these two understandings of body, but the second half seems to refer directly to Polonius, a "king" who's been separated from his body through death. They yawn at it And botch the words up fit to their own thoughts, Which, as her winks and nods and gestures yield them, Indeed would make one think there might be thought, Though nothing sure, yet much unhappily.
What's interesting here is the gentleman's emphasis on how others strive to make sense of her bewildering language. Ophelia seems to act in a way that implies her words carry intentional meaning, and so those around her seek to rearrange i. But the gentleman persists in thinking that her words represent pure madness. Thus, "Her speech is nothing.
Nevertheless there is a mystery about her mental condition. Her choice of songs seems to reveal two obsessions.
Was 't Hamlet wronged Laertes? Never Hamlet. If Hamlet from himself be ta'en away, And when he's not himself does wrong Laertes, Then Hamlet does it not. Hamlet denies it. Who does it, then?
0コメント